Sunday, July 29, 2007

July 29: Review, Reflection, and Thanks

1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was with God in the beginning. 3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. 4 In him was life, and that life was the light of all people. 5 The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.

6 There was a man sent from God whose name was John. 7 He came as a witness to testify concerning that light, so that through him all might believe. 8 He himself was not the light; he came only as a witness to the light.

9 The true light that gives light to everyone was coming into the world. 10 He was in the world, and though the world was made through him, the world did not recognize him. 11 He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him. 12 Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God — 13 children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband's will, but born of God.

14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only [Son], who came from the Father, full of grace and truth. John 1: 1-14

“Word” – Greeks used this term not only for the spoken word, but also for the unspoken word still in the mind, the reason. Applied to the universe, it meant the rational principle that governs all things. Jews used this language as a way of referring to God.

It’s a beautiful image to consider as we think about Scripture, this equating of God and control of the universe with a “word.” The imagery of Genesis has God literally speaking the world into existence. God’s Son is truly “full of grace and truth” – and so is the written word we have from God.

Eugene Peterson describes John 1 as “emphasizing the primacy of language (Word and words) in the very being-ness of God and the way God works . . . “ Eat This Book. And we believe that God is at work . . . working directly in the world and working through the word – the Scriptures. And we believe God’s work is our work, and thus we need to pay attention. Our objectives for this Bible study were to help us pay better attention – to listen:

  • Understand some key principles that frame the interpretation of Scripture
  • Discuss insights on interpretation and context, to help us challenge assumptions and bring a fresh perspective to our reading
  • Review some of the different forms of Scripture (poetry, narrative, parables, epistles, etc.) to help appreciate the richness of divinely inspired/human written Scripture

We’ve talked about the importance of exegesis (there & then) before hermeneutics (here & now), and we’ve discussed literary forms and historical contexts, the idea of reading in paragraphs, and the idea of looking for the larger picture across a given text and the larger messages of Scripture – of probing the author’s (and God’s) intent in presenting their inspired message.

As we wrap up, we’d like to:

  • Look at the larger picture – the “overall story” of the Bible
  • Look at ourselves – as a community trying to listen to this story

The Biblical Story

Too often we might fall into a perception that limits the Bible to a divine guidebook, a long list of commands to be obeyed or a set of theological propositions to be believed. Of course the Bible does provide guidance, and it does contain plenty of true propositions and divine directives – but it is so much more than that.

Here we have the grandest narrative of all – God’s own story – his “Word.” This is not one more story of humankind’s search for God – this is God’s story, the account of His search for us.

A story essentially told in four chapters: Creation, Rebellion, Redemption, Consummation

Creation

God’s story does not begin with a hidden god that people are seeking. On the contrary, the biblical narrative begins with God right from the beginning, presented as the Creator of all that is. – “In the beginning God . . ."

  • The narrative tells us that God is before all things, the cause of all things – and therefore he is above all things and the goal of all things.
  • God stands as the origin of all things, and all creation – all history itself – has the eternal God as its final purpose and consummation.

The narrative also tells us something about humanity

  • We are the crowning glory of the Creator’s work, beings made in God’s likeness, with whom God could commune and in whom he could delight. Beings that would know the pleasure of God’s presence, love, and favor.
  • Created in God’s image, humankind thus enjoyed the vision of God and lived in fellowship with God
  • Nonetheless created beings, and thus intended to be dependent on the Creator for life and existence in the world

Rebellion

This is a long and tragic chapter, and the dark thread runs through the whole story almost to the very end. Humankind coveted godlikeness and chose independence from the Creator – but we were not intended to live so and thus experienced the consequences of our rebellion. Three consequences:

1. Lost our vision of God with regard to his nature and character. Guilty, selfish, hostile ourselves, we projected that onto God – and thus turned from Him to create our own gods in our own image

Paul describes this in Romans 1:21-22, 24

“For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal human beings and birds and animals and reptiles. . . . They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator – who is forever praised.”

In exchanging the truth about God for a lie, we saw God as full of caprice, contradictions, hostility, and retribution – all projections of our fallen selves.

2. Distorted the divine image in ourselves. We were created to image, and thus represent, God in all that we are and do. But instead of being loving, giving, selfless, thoughtful, and merciful – we became selfish, unloving, unforgiving, spiteful, and petty.

3. Loss of the divine presence – and with that our relationship, fellowship with God. In place of communion with the Creator, we became lost, adrift – creatures who broke God’s laws, abused God’s creation, and suffered in our brokenness, alienation, loneliness, and pain.

Humankind’s rebellion created an awful distance between ourselves and God – and we were enslaved to sin, unwilling and unable to come to God for life and restoration.

Redemption

The Bible tells us that the holy and just God, whose moral perfection burns against sin and rebellion, is in fact also a God full of mercy and love and faithfulness. Chapter 3 is all about this merciful, loving God reaching out to redeem and restore God’s rebellious creation – so that God might restore to us the lost vision of God, renew in us the divine image, and reestablish our relationship with God.

Thus God came to a man, Abraham, and made a covenant with him that the world would be blessed through his offspring and the relationship God would establish with them.

He freed them from slavery in Egypt and made a covenant with Israel that he would be their Savior and Protector forever, that he would be uniquely present with them among all the peoples of the world.

But they would also have to keep covenant with him, by letting themselves be reshaped into his likeness. God gave them the Law as a gift to them, both to reveal what God is like and to protect them while they were being reshaped.

But the story tells us they rebelled over and over again – and looked on God’s gift of law as a form of taking away their freedom. So they experienced several rounds of oppression and rescue. God sent them a king, but things go bad again and God in love sends them prophets.

In the end their constant unfaithfulness is too much, and God at last judges his people with captivity and exile – and yet his grace restores the nation and promises a future through a new “son of David.” And the great, final scenes of this chapter reveal that the “son of David” is none other than God himself.

Born as the child of a peasant girl, within the fold of an oppressed people, Jesus taught and lived among us. And through his death and resurrection, he defeated all the powers that have stood against us, and he bore the weight of the guilt and punishment of our rebellion.

The heart of the story – a loving God through his incarnation restored our lost vision of God, through his crucifixion and resurrection made possible our being restored to the image of God, and through the gift of the Spirit became present with us in constant fellowship.

“And we all, who with unveiled faces contemplate the Lord's glory, are being transformed into his image with ever-increasing glory, which comes from the Lord, who is the Spirit.” 2 Corinthians 3:18

Consummation

The story has not yet ended – the final chapter is still being written, but we know how the story turns out. So God’s story is filled with hope for us as we live in the “already/not yet” kingdom. We’re already in the kingdom, but the kingdom is not yet fully realized. We are to live as ambassadors of this kingdom, as people with confidence in the ultimate outcome of God’s story.

We can see how the books of the Bible convey this grand story . . .

Narrative of Israel: Genesis – Esther, tell the story of God’s:

  • covenants with his people
  • faithfulness to them – despite their repeated unfaithfulness to him
  • choice of the lesser or unfavored to work his purpose
  • rescue of them from slavery
  • dwelling among them in the tabernacle and temple
  • gift of the law
  • provision of the sacrificial system
  • choice of a king

Writings of Israel: Job - Lamentations

Inspired human responses to the words and deeds of God

  • Praises, prayers - and questions
  • Reflections on wisdom – “the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom”

Prophets of Israel: Isaiah – Malachi

Voices of God, calling his people back to divine realities

  • They belong to God, God does not belong to them
  • God has a purpose for them – redemption and blessing to all the nations
  • They are to reflect God’s character

Gospels & Acts: Matthew – Acts

Jesus as the centerpiece of the Biblical story

  • His life, his teaching, his character – and his death and resurrection
  • Climax and fulfillment of the story

Epistles & Revelation: Romans – Revelation

  • Instruction, encouragement, and exhortation of God’s redeemed people
  • Christ and the Spirit
  • Already, but not yet – life in Christ is already a reality, but not yet what it will be at the end

We are characters in the story, and yet able to read and benefit from hearing the story.

Now that we’ve looked at the larger story, let’s look at ourselves, as we try to listen to this story.

How are we different from academic students of the Bible?

We are a faith community – we believe the Bible is inspired to tell us God’s story – and thus responding to this story shapes our lives in profound ways. And our response is not just as individuals, but as a community of God’s people

What does that mean for our reading of the Bible? What do we have as a community of listeners?

We are blessed with experience, insight, perspective to share - and contexts both common and varied. This creates the opportunity for “testimony” - not a selfish, uninformed “this is the meaning I give to Scripture” but “this is the meaning Scripture gives to me.”

We also have obligations. Our obligation in community is not just to read and explore Scripture, but to let Scripture shape our individual and community values and behavior.

We are called to be open to Scripture probing our motives, our assumptions, our actions, our rationalizations – and that’s a challenge.

Christian communities do not always meet the challenge. This is not a failure of Scripture, but reflects failures in our character. Avoiding this requires an open community discussion in which we do not force our readings onto Scripture, but allow Scripture to read us.

And that requires open reading and discussion of Scripture – study not just to enlighten our minds with insights or understanding, but study to engage our hearts in action

We need each other – and we need to read to and study with each other:

“Christian communities are central for the ongoing task of enabling people to become wise readers of Scripture. To become wise readers of Scripture, we need to acquire a range of skills and virtues manifested in Christian discipleship. These skills and virtues are given their shape and form under the guidance of the Holy Spirit in and through the particular friendships and practices of Christian communities. They both are prerequisite for, and the result of, wise readings of Scripture.” – Reading in Communion, page 36. Stephen E. Fowl & L. Gregory Jones, Wipf & Stock Publishers, 1998.

We listen best together – and we listen best by doing together . . . .

Our closing reading is James 1:22–25

“22 Do not merely listen to the word, and so deceive yourselves. Do what it says. 23 Those who listen to the word but do not do what it says are like people who look at their faces in a mirror and, after looking at themselves, go away and immediately forget what they look like. 2425 But those who look intently into the perfect law that gives freedom and continue in it—not forgetting what they have heard but doing it—they will be blessed in what they do.”

Thank you for the opportunity to work through this study with you. I appreciate your participation, your comments, your encouragement – and your demonstration of “the skills and virtues manifested in Christian discipleship.”

Sunday, July 22, 2007

July 22: Revelation

1 The revelation from Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John, 2 who testifies to everything he saw—that is, the word of God and the testimony of Jesus Christ. 3 Blessed is the one who reads aloud the words of this prophecy, and blessed are those who hear it and take to heart what is written in it, because the time is near.

4 John, To the seven churches in the province of Asia:
Grace and peace to you from him who is, and who was, and who is to come, and from the seven spirits before his throne, 5 and from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, the firstborn from the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth.

To him who loves us and has freed us from our sins by his blood, 6 and has made us to be a kingdom and priests to serve his God and Father—to him be glory and power for ever and ever! Amen.

7 "Look, he is coming with the clouds,"
and "every eye will see him,
even those who pierced him";
and all peoples on earth "will mourn because of him." So shall it be! Amen.

8 "I am the Alpha and the Omega," says the Lord God, "who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty." Revelation 1:1-8 TNIV


“When we turn to Revelation from the rest of the New Testament, it’s as if we’re entering a foreign country . . . Instead of narratives or letters containing plain statements of facts or imperatives, we come to a book full of angels, trumpets, and earthquakes; of beasts, dragons, and bottomless pits.” Fee & Stuart, How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth.

The book is in the canon, inspired by the Holy Spirit – so it is God’s Word to us – but most folks in the church don’t know what to make of it. Revelation is often omitted from our study - we don’t “cross the border” because of interpretive difficulties:

  • Much of the problem stems from the complex symbolism in the book
  • The book deals in future events while firmly set in a recognizable first century context – it’s hard to sort out the “temporal” prophecy from the “end times” visions
  • Another source of interpretive difficulty is the way John sees everything in light of the Old Testament, which he cites or echoes over 250 times, so that every significant moment in his narrative is imaged almost exclusively in Old Testament language

We won’t try to resolve all the difficulties line by line, and we have to approach Revelation with a proper degree of humility. But we can at least try to dispel much of the nonsense floating around about Revelation in popular culture, and with many church folk.

Much of the popular writing on Revelation jumps straight to hermeneutics – an arrogant appropriation of the text to talk about “here & now” without any thinking about primary context, the writer’s intent, or the original audience, or even God’s overall story.

And thus these “interpretations” usually take the form of fanciful speculations that John himself could never possibly have intended or understood.

Exegesis comes first and in Revelation exegesis is especially important

So we will examine some of the basics of exegesis (there & then):

  • Nature of the text, its literary form, and the challenge of the symbolic language
  • Historical context
  • Literary context
We’ll also look at some of the interpretive issues (here & now)

Revelation as apocalypse, prophecy, and epistle

Revelation is primarily apocalypse – one of dozens of apocalypses that were well-known to Jews and Christians from about 200 BC to AD 200. Some common characteristics:

Taproot of apocalyptic is the Old Testament prophetic literature, especially Ezekiel, Daniel, Zechariah, and parts of Isaiah

Apocalyptic was concerned about judgment and salvation – as is some of the prophetic literature

But apocalyptic was born either in persecution or in time of great oppressionTherefore its greater concern was not God’s activity within history, but looking forward to a time when God would bring a violent, radical end to history – and that end would mean the triumph of good and the final judgment of evil

  • Apocalypses are literary works (not collections of oracles) - with a written structure and stylistic forms and elements, including:

· Literary devices to give them a sense of ancient wisdom, stored up and found for the current time. Most important was their authors’ use of pseudonyms – giving the appearance that their works were written by ancient sages, who were told to “seal it up” for a later day – the later day of course being the time it was actually written

· Presenting their message in the form of visions and dreams

· Use of symbolic language – and the images are often forms of fantasy rather than reality – such as a beast with seven heads and ten horns, a woman clothed in the sun, locusts with scorpion tails and human heads, et al, The fantasy is often in the combination of forms or attributes

· Great fondness for the symbolic use of numbers

· Visions presented in carefully arranged, often numbered sets. Frequently these sets, when put together, express something (for example, judgment) without necessarily trying to suggest that each separate picture follows hard on the heels of its immediate predecessor

Revelation of John fits all these characteristics, except:

  • Not written under a pseudonym
  • Not cast as an “ancient seer” instructed to seal up a message for the present day – John highlights that he was instructed not to “seal up the words of the prophecy of this scroll, for the time is near.” Revelation 22:10

Revelation as prophecy

Revelation is cast in the apocalyptic mold and has the literary characteristics of apocalypse, but John clearly means this apocalypse as a prophetic word to the church, calling it “this prophecy” in the opening verses.

Not sealed for the future, but a word from God for the church’s present situation

Recall from our discussion of the Old Testament prophets that to prophesy does not primarily mean to foretell the future but rather to speak God’s word in the present, a word that usually had as its content coming judgment or salvation.

So this is God’s prophetic word to some churches in the latter part of the first century who are undergoing persecution from without, and some decay from within.

Revelation as epistle

Recipients: Churches in the Roman province of Asia who show a mix of fidelity and internal weakness (Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia, Laodicea)

Occasion

· The early Christians’ refusal to participate in the cult of the emperor (who was acclaimed “lord” and “savior”) was putting them on collision course with the state.

· John saw prophetically that it would get worse before it got better and that the churches were poorly prepared for what was about to take place.

· John writes to both warn and encourage them and to announce God’s judgments against Rome

Dealing with the symbols – importance of thoughtful exegesis

Primary meaning of Revelation is what John intended it to mean, which in turn must have been something his readers would have understood it to mean

· Their advantage over us includes familiarity with their own historical context, and familiarity with the forms and images of apocalyptic literature

· Also had a thoroughgoing acquaintance with the Old Testament, and thus would have recognized the source of John’s echoes and allusions of the Old Testament, and known what he was doing with them

We need to be sensitive to the rich background of ideas that informs the images of Revelation – from Old Testament prophecy, from apocalyptic, from mythology – often these images are not used consistently with their original source

Several kinds of apocalyptic images

· Some are constant (like donkeys and elephants as symbols of political parties). “Beast out of the sea” for example, is a standard image for a world empire, not an individual leader

· Others are fluid – the “Lion” of the tribe of Judah turns out in fact to be a “Lamb”

· Some are specific – the seven lamp stands in 1:12-20 are identified as the seven churches, and the dragon in Chapter 12 is Satan

· Many of the images are probably general – for example, the four horsemen in Chapter 6 probably do not represent any specific expression of conquest, war, famine, and death, but rather represent this expression of human fallenness as the source of the church’s suffering (6:9-11) that will in turn be a cause of God’s judgment

Some cautions on understanding the imagery in Revelation – and to avoid misappropriation

When John himself interprets an image, these interpreted images must be held firmly and must serve as a starting point for understanding other images.

There are six such images:

  1. The one like a son of man (1:13) is Christ, who alone “was dead and . . . is alive for ever and ever!” (1:18)
  2. The golden lamp stands are the seven churches
  3. The seven stars (1:20) are the seven angels, or messengers of the churches
  4. The great dragon (12:9) is Satan
  5. The seven heads (17:9) are the seven hills on which the woman sits (as well as seven kings, thus becoming a fluid image)
  6. The prostitute (17:18) is the great city, clearly indicating Rome

See the images as a whole, and not press allegorically all the details

The whole vision is trying to say something; the details are either for dramatic effect, or add to the picture of the whole so readers will not mistake the points of reference.

John expects his readers to hear his echoes of the Old Testament as the continuation – and consummation – of that story.

· Read 1:7 – a collage from Daniel 7-13 and Zechariah 12:10

· Read 1:12-16 – a collage from Daniel 10:6, Daniel 7:9, 13; Isaiah 49:2; Ezekiel 1:24

· The presentation of Christ climaxes as the “Lion of Judah” (Genesis 49:9), the “Root of David” (Isaiah 1:1) turns out to be a slain Lamb (from the Passover and sacrificial system).

· Final judgment of Rome in chapters 17-18 is expressed in language and images from the several prophetic judgments on Babylon and Tyre in Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel – and Rome itself is called Babylon

Apocalypses in general, and Revelation in particular, seldom intend to give a detailed chronological account of the future. Their messages transcend that concern.

John’s larger message is that despite present appearances, God is in control of history and the church. Even though the church will experience suffering and death, it will be triumphant in Christ, who will judge his enemies and save his people.

Historical context

The key to understanding the historical context is the motif of shared suffering and persecution of God’s people

· John himself was in exile for his faith, and his readers are companions in his suffering (1:9)

· Note in the seven letters such verses as 2:3, 8-9, 13; 3:10 – and the repeated “to those who are victorious”

· In chapter 7, the great multitude has “come out of the great tribulation,” and will never again suffer Read 7:13-17

· In chapters 13-20, suffering and death are specifically attributed to “the beast”

Main historical themes:

· Church and state on a collision course, and initial victory will appear to belong to the state.

· It will get worse before it gets better – John is greatly concerned that they will not capitulate in times of duress.

· But his prophetic word is also one of encouragement – Christ holds the keys to history, and he holds the church in his hands

· God will finally pour out his wrath on those who caused this suffering and death and bring eternal rest to those that remain faithful

One of the keys for interpreting Revelation is to understand the distinction John makes between “tribulation” and “wrath” – confusing those and assuming they mean the same thing will cause us to get very muddled about what’s going on

· Tribulation – the persecution, suffering, and death that the church was enduring and was yet to endure

· God’s wrath – judgment poured on those that have afflicted God’s people

From every context in Revelation, it’s clear that God’s people will not have to endure God’s awful wrath when it is poured out on their enemies, but it is equally clear that they will indeed suffer at the hands of their enemies

Opening of the 5th and 6th seals (Read 6:9-17) raises the two critical questions of the book:

· When the 5th seal is opened, the Christian martyrs cry out “How long, Sovereign Lord, holy and true, until you judge the inhabitants of the earth and avenge our blood?”

Twofold answer: They must “wait a little longer” because there will be many more martyrs, and judgment is absolutely certain – as the 6th seal indicates

· When the 6th seal is opened, the judged cry out “who can withstand it?”

Literary context

Need to think about the visions in Revelation as building blocks for the whole argument – these are not collections of oracles in random order – the book is a creatively structured whole, and each vision is an integral part of that whole.

The visions interlock and repeat and do not seem to be designed to carry one along sequentially in time but rather to amplify the revelation

The book unfolds like a great drama in which the earliest scenes set the stage and the cast of characters, and the later scenes presuppose all the earlier scenes – and must be understood that way in order to follow the plot.

Chapters 1-3 set the stage and introduce most of the significant characters, including John himself who is the “seer” and will be the narrator throughout. Other key characters include Christ and the church.

Chapters 4-5 further help set the stage. With breathtaking visions, set to worship and praise, the church is told that God reigns in sovereign majesty. John reminds them that God’s “Lion” is a “Lamb” who himself redeemed humankind through suffering. And so all heaven bursts forth in praise to God and the Lamb.

Chapters 6-7 begin the unfolding of the actual drama itself. Visions presented in a carefully structured set of seven, in this case seals (happens again in chapters 8-11 – seven trumpets, and in chapters 15-16 – seven plagues, seven bowls). Here we have the horsemen, the martyrs’ question, the earthquake (God’s judgment) and God’s wrath.

Chapters 8-11 reveal the content of God’s temporal judgments on Rome. We’ve moved from the suffering of the church and the judgment of God to the final triumph of God

Chapters 12-22 offer details of this judgment and triumph

Chapter 12 is the theological key to the book. In two visions we are told of Satan’s attempt to destroy Christ and his defeat instead. Satan is revealed as a defeated foe whose final end has not yet come. There is rejoicing because of the salvation of God’s people, yet there is woe to the church because Satan knows his time is limited and he is taking vengeance on God’s people.

Read 12:7-17 – note the parallels to the exodus

Chapters 13-14 – show how Satan’s vengeance took the form of the Roman Empire, with its emperors who were demanding religious allegiance

Chapters 15-16 – the empire and the emperors are doomed

Chapters 17-22 – the book concludes as a “tale of two cities.” The city of earth (Rome) is condemned for its part in the persecution of God’s people. This is followed by the city of God, where God’s people dwell eternally.

Hermeneutical questions

The “here & now” difficulties about Revelation are in some ways similar to the Old Testament prophets, where the “yet to be” had a temporal immediacy to it – where things in the future for them are in the past for us.

We can still hear as God’s Word the reason for the judgments – persecution of God’s people, injustice and oppression.

We can still hear as God’s Word that discipleship goes the way of the cross, that God has not promised us freedom from suffering and death but triumph through it.

Most of our difficulties lie in the challenge that the “temporal” world of prophecy is often so closely tied to the final eschatological realities – and this is especially true in Revelation.

Many want to connect the fall of Rome in chapter 18 as the first chapter of the final wrap-up – the real end of time, and many of the pictures of temporal judgment are interlaced with words or ideas that also imply the final end is part of the picture.

A few suggestions

· Need to learn that the pictures of the future are just that – pictures. They express a reality, but they are not themselves to be confused with the reality, nor are the details of every picture to be “fulfilled” in some specific way.

Thus when the first four trumpets proclaim calamities on nature as part of God’s judgment, we must not necessarily expect a literal fulfillment of all the details of these pictures.

Their point – made by the deliberate echo of God’s plagues against Pharaoh – is to encourage believers under Rome’s soon-coming oppression that God’s “plagues” will fall on Rome as well.

· Must be careful not to spend too much time speculating how any of our own contemporary events may be fitted into the pictures of Revelation.

The book was not intended to prophesy the existence of Communist China, the European Union, or the United Nations (to cite just a few of the wacky inferences people make) or to give us literal details of the end of history.

And yet, for all the effort to read Revelation for an “end times” view . . . we need to continue to mine the last chapters of Revelation for what they have to show us about John's vision for how life here on earth should be a reflection of heaven - and that what we think we see may not be the best picture of reality.

For example, he portrays the heavenly city coming down as an earthly reality (Chapter 21 – Read 21:1-4). Perhaps in the style of most of the rest of the book John is attempting a re-imagining of present realities.

He may be telling the church that through that pivotal point of history, the death and resurrection of Jesus, this weak-looking church is now a heavenly city on earth, bringing the nations of the earth in to its walls to provide healing and comfort.

Maybe we have a difficult time believing that is what he could have had in mind, but this seems most consistent with the rest of the book.

Wrap-up / Recap

Just as the opening word of Scripture speaks of God and creation, so the closing word in Revelation speaks of God and consummation. If there are some ambiguities for us as to how all the details are to work out, there is no ambiguity in the certainty that God will work it out – in God’s time and in God’s way.

And the Revelation provides a large, motivating, awesome vision for the life we can share now, and the life we offer the world. Our vision is not the best description of reality – What if we could see the world as God sees it? What if we had a God-framed view of reality? How would life be different?

Krista Tippett writes in Speaking of Faith: “I sense that seeing the world the way God sees the world means, in part, grieving in places the world does not forgive, and rejoicing in places the world does not notice. It would mean, therefore, to live with a patience that culture cannot sustain, and with a hope the world cannot imagine.”

We can read John’s specific message to the church at Laodicea as a call to see themselves differently:

14 "To the angel of the church in Laodicea write:

These are the words of the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the ruler of God's creation. 15 I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other! 16 So, because you are lukewarm—neither hot nor cold—I am about to spit you out of my mouth. 17 You say, 'I am rich; I have acquired wealth and do not need a thing.' But you do not realize that you are wretched, pitiful, poor, blind and naked. 18 I counsel you to buy from me gold refined in the fire, so you can become rich; and white clothes to wear, so you can cover your shameful nakedness; and salve to put on your eyes, so you can see.

19 Those whom I love I rebuke and discipline. So be earnest, and repent. 20 Here I am! I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in and eat with them, and they with me.

21 To those who are victorious, I will give the right to sit with me on my throne, just as I was victorious and sat down with my Father on his throne. 22 Whoever has ears, let them hear what the Spirit says to the churches." Revelation 3:14-22 TNIV

Next week: Our final session – an opportunity for review and reflection

Sunday, July 15, 2007

July 15: The Psalms

For many Christians the Psalms are the best-known and most-loved portion of the Old Testament. A great example is our opening reading, Psalm 8:

1 LORD, our Lord,
how majestic is your name in all the earth!
You have set your glory
above the heavens.

2 Through the praise of children and infants
you have established a stronghold against your enemies,
to silence the foe and the avenger.

3 When I consider your heavens,
the work of your fingers,
the moon and the stars,
which you have set in place,

4 what are mere mortals that you are mindful of them,
human beings that you care for them? [c]

5 You have made them [d] a little lower than the heavenly beings [e]
and crowned them [f] with glory and honor.

6 You made them rulers over the works of your hands;
you put everything under their [g] feet:

7 all flocks and herds,
and the animals of the wild,

8 the birds in the sky,
and the fish in the sea,
all that swim the paths of the seas.

9 LORD, our Lord,
how majestic is your name in all the earth! TNIV

We think of the Bible as words from God to people, but the Bible also contains words spoken to God or about God (which is what the Psalms are) – and these words are also God’s Word. Throughout our discussion this Sunday, we explored different implications of this type of inspired text.

The Psalms can be misapplied. Many don’t yield their meaning at first glance, and our understanding can be confused by lack of clarity about the “then & there” as we use them “here & now.”

We talked about the nature of the psalms, their function, and some of the different types of Psalms.

Where did the names “Psalms” and “Psalter” come from?

  • From the Septuagint (Greek translation of the OT), where they originally referred to stringed instruments (harp, lyre, lute), then to the songs sung with their accompaniment
  • The traditional Hebrew title is tehillim (meaning praises), even though many of the psalms are tephillot (meaning prayers).

What are the Psalms? Psalms are poems – musical poems

Hebrew poetry was addressed to the mind through the heart. The language is intentionally emotive, and the structure and vocabulary drives an emotional response. Hebrew poetry is intended to appeal to emotions, to evoke feelings, to stimulate a response that goes beyond a mere cognitive understanding of facts.

Opening of Psalm 19:

The heavens declare the glory of God;

the skies proclaim the work of his hands.

Day after day they pour forth speech;

night after night they display knowledge

How might you express this in prose? “God is revealed in his creation, especially in the heavenly bodies.” - Pretty dry compared to the poetry!

A key feature of Hebrew poetry is parallelism:

  • Synonymous parallelism: The second or subsequent line repeats or reinforces the sense of the first line
  • Antithetical parallelism: The second or subsequent line contrasts the thought of the first, often reinforcing the first line by contrast
  • Synthetic parallelism: The second or subsequent line adds to the first line in any matter that provides further information:

We need to embrace the rhythm of the parallels – the building of the imagery and message – to grasp the larger, emotive picture conveyed in the Psalms.

The vocabulary of Hebrew poetry is purposefully metaphorical

We have to learn to listen to the metaphors and understand what they signify – not to search for hidden meanings, but to embrace the imagery for what it invokes. In the book of Psalms, mountains leap like rams; enemies spew out swords from their lips; and God is variously seen as a shepherd, fortress, shield, rock, etc.

We should be careful not to press the metaphors or take them too literally. Psalm 23 doesn’t mean God wants us to be or act like sheep, or else wants us to live a rural, pastoral life – it’s not a treatise against modern city life.

And we need to appreciate the symbolic language of the psalms (metaphor and simile) for what it is intended to invoke and then think through the reality it is conveying. The form of the Psalms requires some cautious reading and interpretation; they can’t be read in the same way as a narrative, epistle, or book of law.

We also need to be careful not to overdo the exegesis, and thus force special meanings into specific phrases or words where the poet meant none. And we should be careful not to overdo the search for doctrine within the Psalms. While they may contain and reflect doctrine, they are not intended as repositories for doctrinal exposition. It’s dangerous and misleading to read a psalm as though it taught a system of doctrine – and thus miss the emotional, relational message it conveys.

Each psalm has its own integrity as a literary unit

Each psalm has a pattern of development by which its ideas are presented, developed, and brought to some kind of conclusion. Psalms are to be treated as wholes, not atomized into single verses

For an obvious example, Read Psalm 51:16. Taken out of context, the verse may seem to suggest that the sacrificial system has no real importance, but how does that fit with what you read later? – Read Psalm 51: 18 – 19. Understanding the overall message requires reading the whole psalm - Read Psalm 51. Taking any part of a psalm out of context may lead to wrong conclusions, and to missing the larger inspired message of the psalm.

Function of the psalms

The Psalms were created as functional songs composed for use in worship by the ancient Israelites.

  • Commonly used as worship aids by Israelites when they brought sacrifices to the temple in Jerusalem
  • Based on some of the titles (e.g., Psalm 80 & Psalm 81), it seems likely that professional singers sometimes sang the psalms during the time people were worshipping
  • Obvious that the knowledge of the psalms spread beyond the temple, and that people began to sing them in all sorts of situations where the wordings expressed their own attitudes and circumstances

Psalms are individual hymns, and the book of Psalms served as the hymnbook for postexilic temple worship.

Psalms are of several different types - Each type of psalm was intended to have a given function in the life of Israel:

  1. Laments
  • Largest group of psalms in the Psalter – more than 60, including individual and corporate laments
  • Express or presuppose deep trust in Yahweh, help a person to express struggles, suffering, or disappointment to the Lord
  • Read Psalm 88 – Read in many chapel services immediately after 9/11
  1. Thanksgiving psalms
  • Expressed joy because something had gone well, because circumstances were good, or because people had a reason to render thanks to God for his faithfulness, protection, and benefit
  • Six community psalms of thanksgiving, ten individual psalms of thanksgiving
  • Read Psalm 124 – corporate thanksgiving
  1. Hymns of praise
  • Center on the praise of God – as Creator of the universe, as protector and benefactor of Israel, as the Lord of history
  • Read Psalm 100
  1. Salvation-history psalms
  • A few psalms that focus on a review of God’s saving works among the people of Israel, especially deliverance from Egyptian bondage and the creation of them as a people (78, 105, 106, 135, 136)
  1. Psalms of celebration and affirmation

  • Several kinds of psalms fall under this category - Covenant renewal liturgies, psalms celebrating/affirming the kingship, psalms for enthronement of the king, songs of Zion

  1. Wisdom psalms
  • Eight psalms (36, 37, 49, 73, 112, 127, 128, 133) praising the merits of wisdom and the wise life
  1. Psalms of trust
  • Ten psalms (including the 23rd Psalm) focused on the fact that God can be trusted and that even in times of despair, his goodness and care for his people ought to be expressed
  • Read Psalm 27: 1-5

To illustrate how knowing a psalm’s form and structure helps us appreciate the message, look at examples of a lament and a thanksgiving psalm:

Lament - Psalm 3 example

Scholars have identified six common elements in the lament psalms – not formal structures, but common elements that may be in different order or emphasis from psalm to psalm

  1. Address – the one to whom the psalm is prayed, the Lord
  2. Complaint – pours out a complaint honestly and forcefully, identifying what the trouble is and why the Lord’s help is sought
  3. Trust – psalmist immediately expresses trust in God. Trust is presupposed in making the complaint. Why pour out a complaint to God if you don’t trust him?
  4. Deliverance – cries out to God for deliverance
  5. Assurance – expresses assurance that God will deliver, parallels the expression of trust
  6. Praise – offers praise, honor, thanksgiving to God for the blessings of the past, present, future

What can we learn from a lament like Psalm 3?

  • Importance of balanced prayer – requests/appreciation, complaints/expressions of confidence
  • Example of openness and honesty – willing to be open and not cover over our problems
  • Use as a guide - use the psalms themselves to express our feelings

Thanksgiving – Psalm 138 example

Thanksgiving psalms have a different structure; scholars have identified five common elements


  1. Introduction – testimony of how God has helped is summarized
  2. Distress – situation from which God gave deliverance is portrayed
  3. Appeal – psalmist reiterates the appeal that he or she made to God
  4. Deliverance – deliverance God provided is described
  5. Testimony – a word of praise for God’s mercy

Order may vary considerably – this is analysis after the fact, not a stylistic form or structure

What can we learn from a thanksgiving psalm like Psalm 13?

  • Encourages reflection on what God has done for us
  • Again, a guide or direct tool – use the psalm itself to express thanksgiving

Wrap-up/Recap

The Psalms show us inspired Scripture through beautiful, emotional words of relationship. The poetry, the imagery, the authentic emotion before God are all part of the overall God story - all part of the truth of God.

We can use the psalms as a means of expression of our thoughts and feelings. When a psalm addresses topic or theme we wish to express, it can help us express our feelings despite our inability to find the right words.

The psalms demonstrate how we can relate honestly to God, and be open in expressing joy, disappointment, sadness, anger and other emotions. The psalms also demonstrate the importance of reflection and meditation on what God has done for us. They invite us to prayer, to thoughtful reflection on God's Word, and to reflective fellowship with other believers.

Closing Reading: Psalm 67- a communal prayer for God’s blessing, perhaps used near the conclusion of worship

1 May God be gracious to us and bless us
and make his face shine on us— [b]

2 so that your ways may be known on earth,
your salvation among all nations.

3 May the peoples praise you, God;
may all the peoples praise you.

4 May the nations be glad and sing for joy,
for you rule the peoples with equity
and guide the nations of the earth.

5 May the peoples praise you, God;
may all the peoples praise you.

6 The land yields its harvest;
God, our God, blesses us.

7 May God bless us still,
so that all the ends of the earth will fear him. TNIV

Next week: Revelation

Sunday, July 8, 2007

July 8: The Prophets

18 Woe to you who long
for the day of the LORD!
Why do you long for the day of the LORD?
That day will be darkness, not light.

19 It will be as though a man fled from a lion
only to meet a bear,
as though he entered his house
and rested his hand on the wall
only to have a snake bite him.

20 Will not the day of the LORD be darkness, not light—
pitch-dark, without a ray of brightness?

21 "I hate, I despise your religious festivals;
I cannot stand your assemblies.

22 Even though you bring me burnt offerings and grain offerings,
I will not accept them.
Though you bring choice fellowship offerings,
I will have no regard for them.

23 Away with the noise of your songs!
I will not listen to the music of your harps.

24 But let justice roll on like a river,
righteousness like a never-failing stream!

Amos 5:18-24 TNIV

Verse 24 may ring familiar with students of modern history. Martin Luther King, Jr. used it within his “I Have a Dream” speech at the Lincoln Memorial in August, 1963. As we think through the roles and messages of the Old Testament prophets, we appreciate how King’s use of this quote is an appropriate modern echo of their themes.

More individual books of the Bible come under the heading of prophecy than any other category – 16 books in total:

  • Four “major”: Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel
  • Last 12 books of the Old Testament (Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi) are called the “minor” prophets, from the Latin term “prophetes minores” – minores meant shorter, not less important

Written in ancient Israel between 760 & 460 BC, the prophets contain a vast array of messages about God, but understanding the prophets can be a challenge, primarily due to misunderstandings about function and confusion about form.

Let’s acknowledge some basic difficulties in reading the prophets

  • Problem of history – very hard to put the words of the prophets in their proper context, given our distance in terms of the religious, historical and cultural life of ancient Israel
  • We know very little about the prophets themselves – we hear from God via the prophets, but very little about them.
  • Hard to read the longer prophetic books in one sitting, and they can be hard to follow. For the most part these books are collection of sayings (oracles) – not always presented in chronological sequence, often without hints as to where one oracle ends and another begins, and often without hints as to historical setting
  • And most of the oracles were spoken in poetry!

Probably the largest problem is an inaccurate understanding of the word “prophecy.” For most folks this means what the dictionary lists first – “foretelling or prediction of the future.”

So many Christians only refer to the prophetic books for predictions about the coming of Jesus, but using the prophets this way is highly selective: Less than 2% of Old Testament prophecy is messianic, less than 5% specifically describes the new-covenant age, less than 1% concerns events yet to come.

The prophets did announce the future, but it was overwhelmingly the immediate future of Israel, Judah, and other surrounding nations, not our future. For us to see the prophecies fulfilled, we have to look back on times that for them were still future, but for us are long past.

If we focus on the prophets as predictors of future events, we’ll miss their primary function, which was to speak for God to their own contemporaries

Two key points about the function of prophecy in Israel:

The prophets were covenant enforcement mediators

Need to understand the OT law is a covenant – a binding contract between two parties, both of whom have obligations under the covenant. The law is expressed in the common covenantal / contractual form of the day, as a covenant would be expressed between a ruler and subjects seeking his protection

The law constituted a covenant between God and his people that included both stipulations and sanctions. In return for benefits and protection, Israel was expected to follow the stipulations (commandments) – or face the sanction. In the Old Testament, God does not just give Israel his law, he enforces it.

Blessings will come to Israel for faithfulness to the covenant. Descriptions of the blessings are found in Leviticus 26: 1-13, Deuteronomy 4:32-40, Deuteronomy 28:1-14
Read Leviticus 26: 3-13

Categories of blessings for covenant faithfulness include life, health, prosperity, agricultural abundance, respect, and safety. Blessings are announced with a warning – if Israel does not obey God’s law, the blessings will cease.

Curses: found especially in Leviticus 26:14-19, Deuteronomy 4:15-28, and throughout Deuteronomy 28:15 – 32:42 Read Leviticus 26: 14-17

The full range of curses can be categorized under ten headings, all beginning with the letter “d”: Death, disease, drought, dearth, danger, destruction, defeat, deportation, destitution, disgrace

Prophets did not invent the blessings or curses they pronounced – they were inspired to express them in novel and captivating ways, but the substance of their pronouncements is grounded in the terms of the covenant.

As we read the prophetic books, we find a simple pattern:

1. Identification of Israel’s sin – or God’s love for his people

2. Prediction of curse or blessing, depending on the circumstances

The prophets’ message was not their own, but God’s

Each prophet has his own unique style, emphases, imagery, and concerns – but God is the one who raised up the prophets to speak his Word to Israel. The Hebrew word for prophet comes from the verb “to call.” If someone presumed to take on the office or role of prophet on their own, this would be good cause to consider them a false prophet

The prophets regularly punctuate their oracles with phrases like “this is what the Lord says” or “declares the Lord.”

  • Most common of the forms in the prophetic books is the “Messenger Speech”
  • These forms were used by messengers in diplomatic or business settings in the ancient world to remind their listeners that they weren’t making up their content but were speaking the exact words of the one who had sent them.

A majority of the time, the prophetic message is thus relayed directly as received from the Lord, in the first person, so God speaks of himself as “I” or “me.”

The prophets were spokespersons / ambassadors for God, so on their own they were neither radical social reformers nor innovative religious thinkers.

  • The social reforms and religious thought that God wished to impart to the people had already been revealed in the covenantal law – these concerns were God’s concerns, and had been expressed in His covenant.
  • The prophets spoke God’s conviction on these matters, and spoke it directly to any group in violation of the covenant – whether royalty, clergy, the ruling class, or any group

Key Themes of the Prophets

Reminding the people of some Devine realities:
  • God is sovereign over everything and everyone
  • The people belong to God, and not the other way around
  • God’s people have a purpose – to be a blessing to the nations
Reminding them that they are to reflect God’s character:
  • By keeping the covenant, and walking in God’s way
  • By living as a community that practices social justice, and shows special care for the weak, the poor, the stranger

But why do all this in poetry?

God chose to speak through his prophets largely through poems. All the prophetic books contain substantial amounts of poetry, and several are exclusively poetic.

Poetry seems a confusing way to express things to many of us, as though it were designed to make ideas less intelligible than more easily understood. Our culture places relatively little emphasis on poetry. But in most ancient cultures, including ancient Israel, poetry was a highly valued form of expression. National epics and key historical and religious memories were preserved in poetry.

In ancient Israel, poetry was widely appreciated as a means of learning. The Israelites found it relatively simple to commit to memory and recall things composed in poetry. The people were used to poetry and could remember the prophecies – they would ring in their ears with a presence that may be difficult for us to appreciate.

Why is there such a concentrated writing down of prophetic words during the three centuries between Amos (760 B.C.) and Malachi (460 B.C.)?

This period in Israel’s history called especially for covenant enforcement mediation. These years were characterized by three things:

  1. Unprecedented political, military, economic, and social upheaval
  2. Enormous level of religious unfaithfulness and disregard for the covenant
  3. Shifts in populations and national boundaries, including enormous shifts in the international balance of power

By 760 B.C., Israel was a nation permanently divided by a long, ongoing civil war

  • Northern tribes (called Israel or Ephraim) were separated from the southern tribe of Judah
  • North – where disobedience to covenant far outstripped anything found in Judah, was slated for destruction by God because of its sin
  • Amos (760) & Hosea (755) announced the impending destruction, and in 722 BC the north fell to Assyria, the superpower in the Middle East at the time

Thereafter, the mounting sinfulness of Judah and the rise of another superpower (Babylon) constituted the subject of many prophets, including Isaiah, Jeremiah, Joel, Micah, Nahum, Habbakuk, Zephaniah, and Ezekiel.

  • In 587 BC, Judah was destroyed for its disobedience

Afterward, Ezekiel, Daniel, Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi announced God’s will for the restoration of his people (beginning with a return from exile in 538 BC, the rebuilding of the nation, and the reinstitution of orthodoxy).

  • Note that a majority of what the prophets announce in the 8th, 7th, and early 6th centuries BC is curse, because the major defeat and destruction of the northern kingdom did not occur until 722 BC, that of the southern kingdom did not occur until 587 BC

The Israelites, north & south, were headed for punishment, so naturally warnings of curse rather than blessing predominated as God sought to get his people to repent

  • After the destruction of both north and south (587 BC), the prophets were moved more often to speak blessings rather than curses. This is because once the punishment of the nation is complete, God resumes his basic plan, which is to show mercy.

All of this follows the basic pattern laid out in Deuteronomy 4:25-31.

When we go below the overall historical context to the specific context of individual messages from the prophets, it helps to recognize the forms of prophetic oracles – let’s look at some of the most common:

The Lawsuit Oracle

  • Read Isaiah 3:13-26 for an example
  • An allegorical literary form called a “covenant lawsuit”
  • Full form includes a summons, charge, evidence, and a verdict – sometimes elements may be implied rather than explicit.

The Woe Oracle

  • “Woe” was the word ancient Israelites cried out when facing disaster or death, or when they mourned at a funeral.
  • God makes predictions of imminent doom using the “woe,” and no Israelite would miss the significance of that word
  • Three elements characterize the form:

1. Announcement of distress

2. Reason for the distress

3. Prediction of doom

  • Read Habbakuk 2:6-8 – a woe oracle against Babylon

The Promise Oracle or “Salvation Oracle”

  • Recognize this form when you find three elements:
    1. Reference to the future
    2. Mention of radical change
    3. Mention of blessing
  • Read Amos 9:11-15 – a typical example, in which the radical change is the restoration of Israel. Here the blessings include life, prosperity, agricultural abundance, respect, and safety.

The prophets articulate God’s concern for both orthodoxy (correct belief) and orthopraxy (correct action). Through the prophets, God called the people of ancient Israel to a balance of right belief and right action – the very balance that the new covenant requires as well:

  • Love the Lord with all your heart, mind, and soul
  • Love your neighbor as yourself

The prophets serve as constant reminders of God’s determination to enforce his covenant, a reminder to “afflict the comfortable and comfort the afflicted,” and most of all a call to action.

Our closing reading: Isaiah 1:11; 15-17

11 "The multitude of your sacrifices—
what are they to me?" says the LORD.
"I have more than enough of burnt offerings,
of rams and the fat of fattened animals;
I have no pleasure
in the blood of bulls and lambs and goats.”

15 When you spread out your hands in prayer,
I will hide my eyes from you;
even if you offer many prayers,
I will not listen.
Your hands are full of blood;

16 wash and make yourselves clean.
Take your evil deeds
out of my sight!
Stop doing wrong,

17 learn to do right!
Seek justice,
encourage the oppressed.
Defend the cause of the fatherless,
plead the case of the widow.

Next week: The Psalms